新疆：哈密公路管理局团委开展形式多样的“五问

百度 严打以创新为名的犯罪行为会议强调，2018年将结合外汇领域违法犯罪活动新特点，加强形势分析和情报共享，提高合力打击成效；紧盯市场动向，在支持金融创新的同时，严打以创新为名的各类外汇违法犯罪行为，及时捕捉和处置风险苗头；循线追踪非法资金交易的上下游犯罪，深挖细查犯罪网络，形成深度打击态势；刑事追责和行政处罚两手抓，使地下钱庄经营者和参与地下钱庄交易的客户受到应有的惩处，形成震慑，根除地下钱庄等外汇违法犯罪活动滋生土壤，维护国家经济与金融安全。

SACRAMENTO, United States, July 10 (Xinhua) -- The Trump administration has filed a 16-page complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, seeking to overturn the state's cage-free egg standards, arguing they inflate food costs nationwide and are preempted by federal law.

The lawsuit filed on Wednesday targets Proposition 2 of 2008 and Proposition 12 of 2018, which require every egg-laying hen whose eggs are sold in California to be housed in a cage-free system with at least one square foot, about 0.09 square meters, of usable floor space and freedom to turn around. Violations can carry penalties of up to 1,000 U.S. dollars and six months in county jail.

U.S. Justice Department lawyers described the state rules as "unnecessary red tape" that "do not advance consumer welfare," contending that California has "effectively prevented farmers across the country from using a number of agricultural production methods which were in widespread use and which helped keep eggs affordable."

The U.S. Egg Products Inspection Act of 1970 gives Washington sole authority to regulate egg quality, inspection and packaging, the complaint added.

Average retail egg prices reached 4.55 dollars per dozen in May, doubling pre-pandemic levels, according to CBS News.

The complaint argued that California, which consumes a large share of the nation's eggs, aggravated those costs by dictating production standards beyond its borders.

California Governor Gavin Newsom's press office dismissed the action in a post on social platform X, saying President Donald Trump is "back to his favorite hobby: blaming California for literally everything."

Previous attempts by other states and industry groups to undo California's standards failed when the U.S. Supreme Court declined review in 2019 and rejected a pork producers' case in 2023.

The federal government now asks the court to declare the measures unconstitutional and bar their enforcement, setting up another high-stakes test of how far states may go in regulating products sold across state lines.